How Many Babies Does Condoms Kill Per Year Abortian

PLoS 1. 2015; 10(6): e0130077.

Scaling Up Family unit Planning to Reduce Maternal and Kid Bloodshed: The Potential Costs and Benefits of Modern Contraceptive Use in Due south Africa

Lumbwe Chola

^one PRICELESS–MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Inquiry Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa,

Shelley McGee

^ane PRICELESS–MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit of measurement (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Kinesthesia of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa,

Aviva Tugendhaft

¹ PRICELESS–MRC/Wits Rural Public Wellness and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), Schoolhouse of Public Wellness, Kinesthesia of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, S Africa,

Eckhart Buchmann

² Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, S Africa,

Karen Hofman

^ane PRICELESS–MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Wellness, Kinesthesia of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, S Africa,

Karin Bammann, Bookish Editor

Received 2014 Sep 8; Accustomed 2015 May xv.

Abstract

Introduction

Family planning contributes significantly to the prevention of maternal and child mortality. Still, many women still do not use modern contraception and the numbers of unintended pregnancies, abortions and subsequent deaths are high. In this paper, nosotros guess the service delivery costs of scaling up modern contraception, and the potential impact on maternal, newborn and child survival in South Africa.

Methods

The Family Planning model in Spectrum was used to project the impact of modern contraception on pregnancies, abortions and births in South Africa (2015-2030). The contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) was increased annually by 0.68 pct points. The Lives Saved Tool was used to estimate maternal and child deaths, with coverage of essential maternal and child health interventions increasing by 5% annually. A scenario analysis was washed to exam impacts when: the change in CPR was 0.one% annually; and intervention coverage increased linearly to 99% in 2030.

Results

If CPR increased by 0.68% annually, the number of pregnancies would reduce from 1.3 million in 2014 to one million in 2030. Unintended pregnancies, abortions and births decrease by approximately 20%. Family planning can avert approximately 7,000 newborn and child and 600 maternal deaths. The total annual costs of providing mod contraception in 2030 are estimated to be Usa$33 million and the cost per user of modern contraception is US$7 per year. The incremental price per life year gained is U.s.$twoscore for children and United states of america$1,000 for mothers.

Determination

Maternal and kid bloodshed remain loftier in Southward Africa, and scaling up family planning together with optimal maternal, newborn and child care is crucial. A huge impact tin can be made on maternal and kid mortality, with a minimal investment per user of modern contraception.

Introduction

Every year, nearly 3,000 mothers and 40,000 children under v years die in S Africa mainly from preventable causes [ane–three]. Although substantial progress has been fabricated in reducing maternal and child mortality in the concluding few years, this will non be sufficient to reach the millennium development goals (MDGs) 4 and five [4]. There is now, more than ever, an urgent need to scale up high impact interventions to save the lives of mothers, newborns and children [5–7]. With just a few months left to the millennium development goals (MDG) deadline in 2015, the focus of the international community is shifting to the post-2015 evolution agenda, with calls for family planning to exist at the cadre of the post-2015 goals because of its potential to contribute to sustainable evolution [8, ix]. Family planning offers skilful value for investment considering it is cross-cutting and impacts nearly all the MDGs, including reduction of poverty and hunger, increasing universal didactics, promotion of gender equality, reduction in maternal and child mortality, reduction in HIV/AIDS and ecology sustainability [10].

The contribution of family planning to maternal and child health cannot be overemphasised. Globally, birth spacing through increased utilise of modern family planning methods can relieve the lives of more than 2 meg newborns and children every year [eleven]. Scaling up family planning could forbid i third of maternal deaths past allowing women to delay motherhood, avoid unintended pregnancies and subsequent abortions [12]. In South Africa, at that place are over eighty,000 registered abortions annually, some of which tin can exist potentially avoided with increased family planning [13]. In addition, teenage pregnancy is high with more than twenty% of girls betwixt fifteen and 19 reporting 'e'er having been pregnant' [fourteen, 15]. These pregnancies can be avoided by improved family planning. Further, because HIV is the underlying crusade in over 40% of maternal deaths, family unit planning could have a significant bear upon on maternal mortality. Female parent-to-child transmission of HIV can also be reduced, leading to a turn down in child mortality.

Despite the benefits, many women in S Africa still practise not use mod contraceptive methods. Their use among women 15–49 increased modestly from 62% in 1998 to 64% in 2003, and in that yr the unmet need for family planning was measured at thirteen% [15]. It is thus critical to ramp upwardly efforts to provide universal access to modern contraception, peculiarly if family planning is to exist at the core of the post-2015 agenda.

The Southward African authorities has demonstrated commitment to expanding its family planning programme. It is party to Family Planning 2020, a global partnership between governments, ceremonious society, donors and other stakeholders, aiming to expand contraceptive use to 120 million more women and girls by 2020 [xvi]. In line with this commitment, in 2012, South Africa developed a new family planning policy, with emphasis on dual protection (using condoms together with other contraception) [17]. The policy revision sought to update family planning provision to include newer contraceptive methods and in early on 2014, new sub-dermal contraception implants were introduced, adding to the available options.

Constructive implementation of Southward Africa'south new family planning program requires information on the necessary resources needed to expand modern contraceptive apply. Such data is, withal scant. In 2012, it was estimated that the toll of contraceptive care in the developing earth was Us$4 billion, and scaling up family planning to meet the need for modern contraception would cost an boosted US$8 billion annually [18]. In South Africa, it is estimated that the total price of family unit planning for all HIV positive women in 2009 was approximately US$3.3 million [19]. However, a consummate film is required to testify the costs and benefits of expanding family planning to all women who need information technology.

This paper shows the potential costs and benefits of scaling upwards mod contraception in South Africa. We model the effects of increasing the contraceptive prevalence charge per unit (CPR) on population size, growth rate, pregnancies, births, abortions and maternal and child bloodshed. This data can inform the implementation of Due south Africa's new family planning policy.

Methods

We used the Spectrum program to model the impact of family planning on maternal and child mortality. Spectrum consists of a suite of modules that are used to assess the impact of interventions on population health. The modules in Spectrum include the Lives Saved Tool (Listing), AIDS Bear on Module (AIM), Family Planning (FamPlan) and Demographic Projections (DemProj) [20]. DemProj is the main Spectrum model, which projects state specific populations by age and sex. The other modules interact with DemProj, to address various issues including fertility, HIV/AIDS and maternal and kid survival. In this assay, we use FamPlan and LiST to examine the touch of family unit planning on fertility rates, pregnancies, births, abortions and maternal and kid survival.

FamPlan helps to inform policy on family unit planning by projecting the requirements needed to accost unmet need for modern contraception in a country. The model can exist used to gear up family planning goals, estimate the service expansion needed to meet the goals, and evaluate alternative methods to attain the goals. FamPlan uses the proximate determinants model of fertility to relate contraception to the total fertility rate. The proximate determinants model of fertility explains the fertility inhibiting factors including contraception, abortion, marriage, postpartum insusceptibility and principal infertility [21, 22]. The model postulates that fertility would be at its highest if these inhibiting factors were non-existent or at a minimum. FamPlan projects the population fertility by considering the upshot of each proximate determinant. Thus, inputs of each proximate determinant of fertility are required in the model: the percent of women aged fifteen–49 years in a sexual union (in our assay, we consider sexually active women, given that many births in South Africa occur outside informal and formal unions), the proportion using modernistic contraception by method, the degree of chief infertility, the use of abortion, and the duration of postpartum insusceptibility to conception. Assumptions include the proximate determinants of fertility and the characteristics of the family unit planning program (method mix, source mix, discontinuation rates) to calculate the cost and the number of users and acceptors of different contraceptive methods by source. FamPlan calculates indicators showing the number of family planning users, commodities required, unplanned pregnancies and births, and numbers of abortions—all based on the data entered into the model, the assumptions made, and the desired outcomes.

In this analysis, the impact of family unit planning is estimated by increasing the contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR). The CPR, the percentage of sexually agile women of reproductive age (fifteen–49 years) using contraceptive methods [15], is used because it is generally easy to mensurate and a straight frontwards indicator of the number of contraceptive users. We used a CPR for South Africa of 64.half-dozen% at baseline (2014). The CPR was and so increased by 0.68% per yr in a 15 yr menses from 2015 to 2030. This was made on the footing of a previously observed alter in CPR of approximately 0.68% per yr between 1998 and 2003 [15].

FamPlan inputs and assumptions

Proximate determinants

The proximate determinants of fertility for South Africa included in this analysis are obtained mainly from the 2003 Demographic and Health Survey [15] and 2013 World Fertility Report [23], and include: a) proportion of women in sexual union anile 15–49 years (46%); b) postpartum insusceptibility—the period after a birth during which a adult female is not exposed to the hazard of pregnancy, was 13 months [15]; c) contraception—the level of contraception use by method is given in Table ane. The use of the sub-dermal implant was negligible earlier 2014, when the National Department of Health began scaling it up. We assumed the utilise of the implant would increase to 0.5% by the end of 2014, 1% in 2015 and 2016, and to 2% thereafter (with the remaining methods of contraception maintaining the same proportions relative to each other); d) the level of unintended pregnancy terminated or induced ballgame was 19%, based on Southern African regional estimates [24]; and e) the prevalence of sterility was five% [15].

Table 1

Percentage use of contraception by method.

Methods	Percent
Male condom	12
Female sterilization	xvi
Male person sterilization	1
Injectable contraceptive	51
Implant (three years)	0
IUD	1
Oral contraceptive	xix

Other assumptions

The unmet need for family planning used was 13% [fifteen], this reflects the departure between women'southward contraceptive behaviour and their reproductive intentions. Based on Spectrum, the total fertility rate, the number of children that would be born to a woman if she were to live to the stop of her childbearing years, was estimated to be 2.43 in 2014.

Contraception costs

Costs of scaling upwardly family planning were modelled in FamPlan, using cost data from the United nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Details of the costing methodology are provided elsewhere [18]. Costing took an ingredients approach and was undertaken from a health service provider perspective. Both directly and indirect costs are included. Directly costs were estimated for contraceptive commodities, supplies and labour needed for counselling, method provision and supply, follow-up and method removal (where needed). Unit costs are obtained from the Management for Sciences Health International Drug Price Indicator, United Nations Children'south Fund Supply Catalogue and the WHO-Selection database. Indirect costs included program management, supervision, personnel training, wellness education, monitoring and evaluation, advocacy, systems strengthening and maintenance and expansion of physical capacity for health facilities. All prices were adjusted to 2012 The states dollars. The almanac unit costs of each contraceptive method are provided in Table 2.

Table 2

Unit of measurement costs (2012 Us dollars) of contraceptive methods per yr.

Method	Cost (US$)
Male rubber	3.9
Female sterilization	2.79
Male sterilization	1.59
Injectable contraceptive	nine.fourteen
Implanon (3 years)	7.74
Oral contraceptive	viii.72
IUD	1.01

Estimating the touch of Family Planning on maternal and kid survival

After making adjustments to the FamPlan model in Spectrum, the touch on of scaling upwards family planning on maternal, newborn and child survival tin can be assessed in List [25], which has been extensively used to model the impact of intervention scale up on maternal and child mortality [5, half dozen, 26]. National baseline information on mortality rates and causes of death, background variables (e.g. fertility, economical status), current coverage of more than 60 interventions and their associated effectiveness values relative to specific causes of expiry and chance factors are used to estimate the deaths averted, overall and by specific interventions.

We used a maternal mortality ratio of 269 deaths per 100,000 live births [iv], under-five mortality charge per unit of 41/one,000 and neonatal mortality charge per unit of thirteen/1,000 [3]. The causes of maternal [27], newborn and kid [28] mortality used are given in Fig 1.

Causes of child, new built-in and maternal deaths in SA used in the List model.

The baseline coverage of interventions included in Listing was reviewed and where possible compiled using national population based data (Table 3). LiST does not provide default coverage values for all interventions included in the model. Some of these interventions include ectopic pregnancy, management of abortions, pre-eclampsia and clean nascence practices. Information on the coverage of these interventions in S Africa are besides non bachelor. The coverage levels used in our analysis are based on consensus obtained from local experts beyond maternal and kid health on reasonable coverage levels obtaining in South Africa, taking into consideration recent policy changes, financial and resource inputs, and observed localised coverage change. The consultation with the experts took place at a one 24-hour interval meeting to discuss the trends in maternal and kid interventions in Southward Africa. We invited 23 participants who work in the health sector in various positions at national and district level, clinical do and academia. The participants deliberated on the coverage levels of each intervention, drawing on their own experiences.

Table 3

Baseline (2014) intervention coverage of interventions included in the Listing model.

Interventions	Baseline coverage
Safe abortion services	35
Postal service abortion case management	60
Ectopic pregnancy instance management	40
Antenatal care (four visits)	50
Tetanus toxoid vaccination	77
Calcium supplementation	5
Hypertensive affliction case direction	40
Diabetes example management	10
MgSO4—Direction of pre-eclampsia	75
Fetal growth restriction detection and direction	10
Skilled birth attendance (SBA)	93
Facility delivery (clinic and hospital)	87
Unassisted deliveries	5
Basic emergency obstetric care (BEMOC)	5
Comprehensive emergency obstetric care (CEMOC)	l
Clean birth practices	70
Firsthand cess and stimulation	70
Labour and delivery direction	93
Neonatal resuscitation	40
Antenatal corticosteroids for preterm labour	20
Antibiotics for rapture of membrane	25
MgSO4 management of eclampsia	lxxx
Active management of the third stage of labour	eighty
Induction of labour for pregnancies lasting 41+ weeks	10
Promotion of breastfeeding	25
Preventive postnatal intendance	10
Make clean postnatal practices	10
Complementary feeding—education only	10
Complementary feeding—supplementation and education	v
Vitamin A supplementation	50
Improved h2o source	91
Water connexion in the habitation	69
Improved sanitation—Utilization of latrines or toilets	74
Hand washing with lather	17
Hygienic disposal of children's stools	41
BCG	74
Polio	74
DPT	66
Hib	66
HepB	74
Pneumococcal	64
Rotavirus	66
Measles	74
Maternal Sepsis case management	75
Kangaroo mother intendance	25
Case direction of severe neonatal infection	44
Injectable antibiotics	70
Full supportive care	44
ORS—oral rehydration solution	fifty
Antibiotics—for treatment of dysentery	80
Zinc—for treatment of diarrhoea	ten
Oral antibiotics: instance management of pneumonia in children	73
Vitamin A—for treatment of measles	75
Therapeutic feeding—for severe wasting	45
Treatment for moderate astute malnutrition	x
PMTCT	90
Early treatment of HIV in pregnant women	40
Treatment of TB in pregnant women	50
Treatment of injuries in children 1–5 years	50
Handling of TB in children ane–5 years	50

In the base instance analysis, maternal, newborn and child deaths were then estimated, holding this baseline coverage constant, and compared to a scenario where coverage of all interventions was increased linearly by 0.5% per year. Taking 2014 as the base of operations year, intervention scale up was started in 2015.

The impact of family planning on maternal and child mortality was measured in terms of deaths averted. Commencement, we calculated the expected number of deaths at the current (baseline) level of intervention coverage. 2d, the numbers of deaths were recalculated with increased coverage for all interventions in the year 2030 (5% annually). Deaths averted (or additional lives saved) were then estimated by subtracting the numbers of deaths at baseline from the deaths at scale. The deaths averted attributed to family unit planning were measured by subtracting the number of deaths with and without changes in the level of family planning. We besides estimated the potential life years gained, which were calculated every bit deaths averted multiplied by life expectancy, using a life expectancy at nascence of threescore years for newborns and children [29], and a reproductive-aged life expectancy of 27 years for mothers [30].

Scenario analysis

A scenario assay was undertaken to test the touch of changes in the base of operations case assumptions, where CPR was increased minimally past 0.1%. Due to data unavailability, this choice was made to represent a lower uptake of family planning. In the scenario analysis, all essential maternal, newborn and child interventions were linearly scaled up until coverage reached 99% in 2030.

Results

Base of operations case analysis

The results of this assay show the touch on of increasing the contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) on the total fertility rate (TFR), births, abortions and maternal and child deaths. Likewise presented are the total annual costs of scaling up family planning methods past 0.68% per year. The baseline CPR was 64.6% (Table 4), which was projected to increase to 75.5% in 2030 (with CPR increasing by 0.68% per year).

Tabular array 4

Base case results for projected demographic events and impact of family unit planning on maternal, newborn and child mortality.

Projected demographic events	2014 baseline	Changes in 2030
Contraceptive prevalence rate (%)	64.6	75.v
Total fertility rate (number)	ii.43	1.65
Total number of pregnancies	one 336 800	1 006 000
Unintended pregnancies (number)	535 400	383 500
Abortions (number)	103 400	74 071
Live births (number)	1 059 600	939 500
Projected impact on mortality	2014 baseline	Changes in 2030
Number of maternal deaths	two 800	ane 700
Number of child deaths (0–69)	38 100	28 300
Number of neonatal deaths	12 800	x 800
Maternal mortality ratio (deaths per 100,000 live births)	269	210
Maternal mortality rate (deaths per 10,000 women aged 15–49)	21	11
Nether-5 bloodshed rate (deaths per 1,000 live births)	41	34
Neonatal bloodshed rate (deaths per 1,000 live births)	12	12
Deaths averted by family planning (2030)	Deaths averted	Potential life years gained
Maternal deaths	600	xvi 200
Child deaths (0–69 months)	five 900	354 000
Neonatal deaths	1 500	90 000

Touch on on demographic events and maternal, newborn and kid mortality

The TFR was estimated to be ii.43 in 2014, and by 2030, would decline to 1.65; the total number of pregnancies reduce to one million (Table 4), and unintended pregnancies, abortions and births reduce by approximately 23%.

At baseline, before scale upward of family unit planning or other interventions, the total annual number of maternal deaths was estimated to be two,800 (Table 4). In 2030, this would reduce to approximately 1700 (with scale upwards of maternal and child interventions by 0.5% per year).

The annual numbers of child deaths reduce from approximately 38,000 in 2014 to 28,000; and the deaths of newborns reduce from 12,800 to 10,800 in 2030.

The maternal mortality ratio (estimated at 269 in 2014) would reduce to 210 maternal deaths per 100,000 alive births. The maternal mortality rate (deaths per x,000 women 15–49 years) reduces from 21/ten,000 in 2014, to 12/10,000.

Increasing family planning past 0.68 percentage points per year averted an additional 600 maternal deaths in 2030. The number of child and neonatal deaths averted by family planning were 5,900 and ane,500, respectively (Table iv). The potential life years gained were sixteen,200 for mothers, 354,000 for children and 90,000 for neonates.

Commodity requirements and costs of family unit planning

Table 5 shows the annual number of units of each contraceptive method required to come across the need when family planning is scaled up. If family unit planning increases by 0.68 percentage points per twelvemonth, the contraceptive requirements between 2014 and 2030 increment as follows: required units of male condoms increases from 54 one thousand thousand to 72 million; injectable contraception increases from seven one thousand thousand to 10 one thousand thousand; the implant increases from 19,200 to 41,800; the oral contraceptive increases from 10 million to 12 million; and IUD from 23,500 to 27,800.

Table 5

Base case results for total commodity (number of units) requirements for each contraceptive method per year.

Commodity	2014 baseline	Changes in 2030
Male prophylactic	54 636 800	72 260 200
Injectable contraceptive	7 740 200	10 238 000
Implant	nineteen 270	41 800
Oral contraceptive	10 813 500	12 044 700
IUD	23 500	27 800

The total annual costs of providing contraception in 2014 (before calibration up) are estimated to be approximately Usa$26 one thousand thousand. In 2030, the annual costs would be US$33 million (if CPR increases by 0.68% per twelvemonth).

The almanac number of users of modern methods of contraception is projected to be four million in 2014, and by 2030 will rise to 5.5 one thousand thousand. The average toll per user per year of modern contraception is nigh The states$7 and the annual cost per capita (total cost/total South African population) is US$0.6. The almanac price of family planning per potential life year gained is US$ 2,000 for mothers, Us$79 for children and U.s.$320 for newborns. The incremental cost (2030 costs minus 2014 costs) per decease averted is Usa$2400 for child and US$xxx,000 for maternal deaths. The incremental cost per life twelvemonth gained is US$40 for children and United states$ane,000 for mothers.

Scenario analysis

Table 6 shows the results of the scenario assay for the projected demographic events and impact of family planning on maternal, newborn and kid bloodshed (in 2030). The projected TFR is 2.3, the total number of pregnancies are ane.3 million, and maternal deaths are 1,100. The maternal bloodshed rate (21/ten,000 at baseline) is expected to be viii/x,000. Increasing family unit planning in the scenario assay would avert 300 maternal, iv,500 child and ane,300 neonatal deaths in 2030 (Table 7).

Table vi

Results of scenario assay for projected demographic events and bear upon of family planning on maternal, newborn and child mortality (shown are changes in 2030).

Projected demographic events	CPR increases by 0.1%
Contraceptive prevalence rate (%)	66.2
Total fertility rate (number)	two.30
Total number of pregnancies	1 341 100
Unintended pregnancies (number)	533 200
Abortions (number)	103 000
Alive births (number)	one 064 000
Projected touch on on mortality	CPR increases by 0.1%
Number of maternal deaths	i 100
Number of child deaths (0–69)	18 100
Number of neonatal deaths	4 700
Maternal bloodshed ratio (deaths per 100,000 live births)	108
Maternal bloodshed rate (deaths per 100,000 women anile 15–49)	8
Under-5 mortality rate (deaths per 1,000 live births)	17
Neonatal mortality rate (deaths per i,000 live births)	four

Tabular array 7

Results of the scenario analysis for projected deaths averted and potential life years gained by family planning.

Deaths averted	CPR increases by 0.1%
	Deaths averted	Potential life years gained
Maternal deaths	300	8 100
Child deaths (0–69 months)	4 500	270 000
Neonatal deaths	1 300	78 000

Fig 2 compares the total almanac costs of providing contraception in all scenarios. Compared to an estimated toll of US$26 million in 2014, the annual costs of providing contraception would be U.s.$29 meg in the scenario analysis (Fig two).

Total annual costs (2012 U.s.$) of family planning projected past the model.

Discussion

This newspaper demonstrates the potential impact of increasing the use of mod contraception on fertility, and maternal, newborn and child survival in South Africa. Using a model for family unit planning, we scaled upwards the contraceptive prevalence rate, over a catamenia of 15 years (2015 to 2030), by 0.68 percentage points annually. In a scenario analysis, we tested the impact of increasing CPR by 0.1% annually. In addition, nosotros assumed that maternal, newborn and child interventions to reduce bloodshed (including emergency obstetric intendance, antenatal care, kangaroo mother intendance and breastfeeding promotion) were scaled up by 0.5% annually (and 99% by 2030 in the scenario assay). The results bear witness that in 2030, unintended pregnancies, abortions and births could reduce by approximately 23% if CPR increases by 0.68% per year. This could avert 7,000 child and newborn deaths and avoid 600 maternal deaths per yr. Scaling upwardly family planning volition have a huge impact on the total fertility charge per unit, which would fall to ane.65. This is far below the population replacement rate, and would brand South Africa comparable to countries such as Brazil (i.8) and Singapore (1.3) [31]. The fertility rate at this level would see an eventual decline in population growth in South Africa.

The results on maternal and child survival are made on the basis of aspirational goals (0.five% per year and 99% intervention coverage by 2030), which may non be easy for Southward Africa to attain in the brusque-term, and does not take into business relationship the quality of these interventions. However, the rates of calibration up were selected in club to show what might exist possible if concerted efforts were made to optimise intervention coverage. The rapid increase in coverage of interventions such as skilled attendance at birth, immunisations and PMTCT in the final decade, betoken that attainment of full intervention coverage may exist feasible. Similarly, achieving the suggested contraceptive prevalence rates may seem daunting, only it is possible as shown by countries such as Brazil and Thailand, where contraceptive prevalence is above 80% [31].

In this analysis, we take provided an approximate of the commodity requirements and costs should the contraceptive prevalence rate increase. The total annual costs of providing modern contraception are estimated to exist The states$33 million in the base of operations case assay and US$29 million (US$0.5 per capita) in the scenario analysis. The cost of scaling up family unit planning would corporeality to less than 0.5% of the 2014 national health budget, and about i% of the current principal healthcare expenditure per capita of United states of america$74 [32]. We, however, cannot state on the basis of this testify that scaling upward family planning is affordable to the South African government. In our results, we provide estimates of cost-effectiveness ratios measured as costs per potential life years gained. These show that scaling upwards family planning is highly price-effective, when judged confronting the gdp per capita threshold [33]. Such information could exist used in time to come analyses to compare the cost-effectiveness of family unit planning to other maternal and child health interventions.

The results provided in this paper should exist taken with circumspection, equally they do not imply that expanding family planning will necessarily lead to an increased use in contraception. At that place are many barriers to contraceptive use from both the demand and supply side [34, 35]. In Southward Africa, the leading reasons for not using contraceptives include concerns regarding side furnishings and opposition past partners [36, 37]. Among adolescents, parental consent is frequently an issue, and in a land such every bit South Africa where 'traditional' values are entrenched, and sex is in many cases still a taboo topic, sexually active adolescents may not easily access contraception even if it were fabricated freely available [38]. On the supply side, efforts should be made to address inadequate logistics and protocols [39] and strengthen the training of front-line health workers in the provision of family planning [36]. Contraceptives should also be made readily available and the demand for the variety of methods should be met, equally this is essential to meeting women's desire to space births. It is also important to deal with the problem of health worker biases and judgmental attitudes, particularly with regard to adolescents who wish to access family planning services [37].

Addressing these bug could require essentially more than resource than the current model is capable of generating, and could significantly lead to college societal costs. More needs to be done to understand these costs. Furthermore, the costs estimated in this paper are dependent on the contraceptive method mix, and a alter in this distribution could impact the associated costs. However, should this be the example in future, the unit costs provided here [xviii] could exist used to make the necessary adjustments. In addition, the costs of scaling up cardinal interventions to reduce maternal, newborn and child mortality take not been included in this analysis, but they should be included in hereafter, since funding for family planning cannot be considered in isolation, merely as role of a package of essential interventions.

The full benefits of family planning on the wellness organisation could not be entirely addressed in this analysis, withal the consequences may be greater than the impact on mortality. We estimated approximately one.3 meg pregnancies and deliveries in South Africa, which can exist reduced past ramping upwardly family planning. With fewer pregnancies and births, more resources could exist freed up, potentially leading to an improvement in service commitment for antenatal care and childbirth.

Further, in order to fully realise the benefits of family planning, choices must be fabricated on the appropriate indicators to mensurate progress and impact. The choice of maternal mortality ratio, instead of maternal bloodshed charge per unit as the primal MDG 5 indicator does not adequately portray the positive role of family unit planning. As shown in our sensitivity assay results, the touch of family planning on the maternal mortality ratio remained static even after scaling upwards family planning in both scenarios. This may be considering the accented number of maternal lives saved is not incorporated in the maternal mortality ratio, since increasing contraceptive prevalence reduces the number of births, the denominator in the ratio. Maybe a more informative measure would be the maternal mortality rate, whose denominator is the number of women in the reproductive age group.

One of the impediments to constructive investment in family unit planning is bereft data on the use of modern contraception. Bachelor information on contraceptive prevalence and the unmet need for family planning in South Africa are either outdated or inadequate. The final measurement of national level unmet need was made in the 2003 Southward Africa Demographic and Health Survey. Several developments accept occurred since then, and the demand to update these statistics cannot be overemphasized. National data on the method mix of contraceptive use is bachelor in some surveys, and the District Wellness Information Arrangement (DHIS). On the confront of it, the DHIS could provide a proxy for contraceptive use, but its reliability is of business, since it is just nerveless in health facilities, and contains many inconsistencies. Furthermore, nearly of the data available, particularly institutional data, are not age-disaggregated or sub-grouping stratified. Therefore, in this analysis, we used a broad historic period-group of 15–49 years. A more insightful analysis could have been performed if data in five year historic period-groups had been available. It is of import to take into account the age-distribution of users, as this has an impact on the usage of contraception and the benefits that can be realised from family planning. Another limitation of the Spectrum model is that it does not take into account the touch of nativity spacing on kid bloodshed, hence information technology underestimates the benefits of family planning. The importance of birth spacing to child survival is well documented and studies have shown that higher nativity intervals are associated with lower risks of kid mortality [xi, xl]. Spectrum does not include this human relationship, since intervention impact is estimated through the reduction of causes of child death. These are considerations that should exist made in future analyses when changes to the model are fabricated to account for such effects.

As nosotros approach the mail service-2015 era, emphasis should be placed on renewed efforts to reduce maternal and child mortality. The expansion of family planning services in many low and heart income countries, including South Africa has been hampered past shifts in international health and development priorities, and the focus of attending on HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases and poverty consolation [41]. This has resulted in a disproportionate resource allotment of resources to vertical programmes such as HIV/AIDS. Greater accent should be placed on more comprehensive packages.

Conclusions

Scaling upwards family planning can assist avoid almost 7,000 newborn and child deaths and 300 maternal deaths annually; with investments of approximately U.s.$7 per user per twelvemonth. This is probably a minimal estimate because other requirements such every bit logistics and infrastructure, which touch on on costs, have not been considered. As we approach the end line of the millennium development goals, in that location is great need for an appraisement of the impact of the family planning policy in the terminal decade, and to detect solutions to the many challenges facing its adequate implementation. Pregnant strides could be made in the mail service-2015 agenda by focusing on increasing essential maternal and child interventions, and bringing family planning to the fore. Nosotros estimate that with concerted efforts and appropriate investment, South Africa can reach its MDG four target of 20 child deaths per 1,000 live births by 2030; and also get closer to meeting its MDG v target of reducing maternal bloodshed.

Acknowledgments

Nosotros would similar to admit Ingrid Friberg and Bill Winfrey at the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health for their back up with respect to the List analyses.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Data Availability

All relevant data are available within the paper.

References

1. WHO. Trends in Maternal Bloodshed: 1990 to 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2012. [Google Scholar]

ii. Stats SA. Mortality and causes of death in South Africa, 2011: Findings from death notification. Pretoria, S Africa: Stats SA, 2014. [Google Scholar]

3. Dorrington RE, Bradshaw D, Laubscher R. Rapid bloodshed surveillance report 2012. Cape Town, South Africa: Due south African Medical Research Council, 2014. [Google Scholar]

4. Stats SA. Millennium Development Goals State Report. Pretoria, Due south Africa: Stats SA, 2013. [Google Scholar]

5. Chopra G, Daviaud Eastward, Pattinson R, Fonn S, Lawn JE. Saving the lives of South Africa'south mothers, babies, and children: tin can the health organization evangelize? Lancet. 2009;374(9692):835–46. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61123-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

6. Pattinson R, Kerber Yard, Buchmann E, Friberg IK, Belizan M, Lansky S, et al. Stillbirths: how can health systems deliver for mothers and babies? Lancet. 2011;377(9777):1610–23. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62306-9 . [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. South Africa Every Expiry Counts Writing Group, Bradshaw D, Chopra M, Kerber Thou, Backyard JE, Bamford 50, et al. Every death counts: use of bloodshed audit information for determination making to save the lives of mothers, babies, and children in South Africa. Lancet. 2008;371(9620):1294–304. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60564-4 . [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

eight. Fabic MS, Choi Y, Bongaarts J, Darroch JE, Ross JA, Stover J, et al. Meeting demand for family planning within a generation: the post-2015 calendar. Lancet. 2014. 10.1016/S0140-6736(fourteen)61055-ii . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

9. Petruney T, Wilson LC, Stanback J, Cates W. Family planning and the mail service-2015 development agenda. Message of the World Health Organization. 2014;92:548–A. x.2471/BLT.xiv.142893 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

10. Cates W Jr. Family planning: the essential link to achieving all 8 Millennium Evolution Goals. Contraception. 2010;81(six):460–1. x.1016/j.contraception.2010.01.002 . [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

eleven. Rutstein And then. Furnishings of preceding birth intervals on neonatal, infant and under-v years mortality and nutritional condition in developing countries: evidence from the demographic and health surveys. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2005;89 Suppl 1:S7–24. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.012 . [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

12. Collumbien M, Gerressu G, Cleland J. Not-use and use of ineffective methods of contraception In: Ezzati 1000, Lopez AD, Rogers A, Murray CJL, editors. Comparative quantification of health risks: Global and regional burden of disease attributable to selected major hazard factors. Geneva: Earth Health Arrangement; 2004. p. 1255–320. [Google Scholar]

xiv. Willan W. A review of teenage pregnancy in South Africa—Experiences of schooling, and knowledge and access to sexual and reproductive health services. Due south Africa: Partners in Sexual Health, 2013. [Google Scholar]

fifteen. National Section of Health, Medical Research Council, OrcMacro. South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Pretoria: NDOH, 2007. [Google Scholar]

16. FP2020. Progress Report 2012–2013: Partnership in Action. Washington DC: FP2020, 2013. [Google Scholar]

17. National Department of Health. National contraception and fertility planning policy and service delivery guidelines, 2012—A companion to the national contraception and clinical guidelines. Pretoria: NDOH, 2012. [Google Scholar]

eighteen. Singh S, Darroch JE. Adding It Upward: Costs and Benefits of Contraceptive Services—Estimates for 2012. New York, The states: Guttmacher Institute and United nations Population Fund (UNFPA), 2012. [Google Scholar]

19. Halperin DT, Stover J, Reynolds HW. Benefits and costs of expanding access to family planning programs to women living with HIV. Aids. 2009;23 Suppl 1:S123–xxx. 10.1097/01.aids.0000363785.73450.5a . [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

20. Stover J, McKinnon R, Winfrey B. Spectrum: a model platform for linking maternal and child survival interventions with AIDS, family planning and demographic projections. International journal of epidemiology. 2010;39 Suppl 1:i7–10. 10.1093/ije/dyq016 [PMC gratis article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Stover J. Revising the proximate determinants of fertility framework: what have we learned in the past xx years? Studies in family planning. 1998;29(three):255–67. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Bongaarts J. A Framework for Analyzing the Proximate Determinants of Fertility. Population and Evolution Review. 1978;four(1):105–32. 10.2307/1972149 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

23. United Nations Department of Economical and Social Affairs. Population Segmentation. World Fertility Study 2012. New York, U.s.: United nations, 2013. [Google Scholar]

24. Singh Due south, Wulf D, Hussain R, Bankole A, Sedgh M. Ballgame Worldwide: A Decade of Uneven Progress. New York: Guttmacher Establish, 2009. [Google Scholar]

25. Walker N, Tam Y, Friberg IK. Overview of the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). BMC public health. 2013;13 Suppl 3:S1 x.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S1 [PMC free commodity] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

26. Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Bahl R, Backyard JE, Salam RA, Paul VK, et al. Tin can bachelor interventions end preventable deaths in mothers, newborn babies, and stillbirths, and at what cost? Lancet. 2014. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60792-3 . [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

27. NCCEMD. Saving Mothers 2008–2010—Fifth report on the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in Southward Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: NDOH, 2012. [Google Scholar]

28. Pillay-van Wyk V, Msemburi W, Laubscher R, Dorrington RE, Groenewald P, Matzopoulos R, et al. Second National Burden of Disease Written report Due south Africa: national and subnational mortality trends, 1997?2009. The Lancet. 2013;381:S113. [Google Scholar]

29. Stats SA. Mid-year population estimates. Pretoria, South Africa: Stats SA, 2013. [Google Scholar]

xxx. Canudas-Romo V, Liu L, Zimmerman Fifty, Ahmed Due south, Tsui A. Potential gains in reproductive-aged life expectancy by eliminating maternal bloodshed: a demographic bonus of achieving MDG 5. PloS one. 2014;9(two):e86694 10.1371/journal.pone.0086694 [PMC gratuitous article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

31. UNICEF. State of the world's children—children with disabilities. New York: UNICEF, 2013. [Google Scholar]

32. Tathiah N. Fiscal indicators In: Massyn North, Solar day C, Dombo M, Barron P, English R, Padarath A, editors. District wellness barometer. Durban, South Africa: HST; 2013. [Google Scholar]

33. WHO. Guide to cost effectiveness analysis. Geneva: WHO, 2003. [Google Scholar]

34. Prata N. Making family planning accessible in resource-poor settings. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences. 2009;364(1532):3093–nine. ten.1098/rstb.2009.0172 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

35. Culwell KR, Vekemans M, de Silva U, Hurwitz Chiliad, Crane BB. Disquisitional gaps in universal access to reproductive health: contraception and prevention of dangerous ballgame. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2010;110 Suppl:S13–6. x.1016/j.ijgo.2010.04.003 . [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

36. Richter MS, Mlambo GT. Perceptions of rural teenagers on teenage pregnancy. Health SA Gesondheid. 2005;10(2):61–9. [Google Scholar]

37. Wood K, Jewkes R. Claret Blockages and Scolding Nurses: Barriers to Adolescent Contraceptive Use in South Africa. Reproductive health matters. 2006;14(27):109–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

38. Lebese RT, Maputle SM, Ramathuba DU, Khoza LB. Factors influencing the uptake of contraception services by Vatsonga adolescents in rural communities of Vhembe District in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Health SA Gesondheid. 2013;18(i). 10.4102/hsag.v18i1.654 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

39. Baumgartner JN, Morroni C, Mlobeli RD, Otterness C, Myer L, Janowitz B, et al. Timeliness of contraceptive reinjections in South Africa and its relation to unintentional discontinuation. International family planning perspectives. 2007;33(two):66–74. 10.1363/ifpp.33.066.07 . [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

twoscore. DaVanzo J, Hale 50, Razzaque A, Rahman Thou. The effects of pregnancy spacing on infant and kid mortality in Matlab, Bangladesh: how they vary by the type of pregnancy outcome that began the interval. Population studies. 2008;62(2):131–54. x.1080/00324720802022089 . [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

41. Singh Southward, Darroch JE, Ashford 50, Vlassoff Grand. Adding it up: the costs and benefits of investing in family planning and maternal and newborn health. New York: Guttmacher Institute and UNFPA, 2009. [Google Scholar]

thompsonquited60.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4468244/

Share this post